Menu

Assessing the Quality of Adaptation Finance 

A Decision-Support Tool for Public Finance Providers 

Public finance providers must allocate scarce resources strategically to maximize adaptation and development outcomes. This paper and tool offer guidance for achieving this. The interactive tool below helps practitioners assess an intervention’s impacts at the project, market, and system levels, considering four common public finance approaches: grants, debt, equity, and risk-transfer tools (e.g., guarantees and insurance).  

This tool does not yield comparative benchmarking but rather identifies strengths and surfaces gaps to support better decision-making over time. Each project is assessed against the tool’s criteria, with three assessment levels indicating the direction of travel:

Fig-1-3-level-lens-for-assessing-quality-of-A-and-R-finance

Three-Level Lens for Assessing Quality of Adaptation & Resilience Finance

Initial: A starting point—indicating interventions that do not yet engage with the given criterion in a meaningful way.
Progressing: Making meaningful progress—core elements are in place for this criterion, but there are gaps that limit quality or depth.
Transformative: The north star—ambitious, evidence-based, and delivering durable adaptation outcomes.

Use the filters in the interactive table below to assess descriptors at each level. The accompanying report provides methodological guidance, supporting analysis, illustrative examples, and practical insights to support use of the tool, including analyses of adaptation-tagged ODA, adaptation finance and sovereign debt sustainability, and a case study applying the project- and market-level criteria.

Download the report

Explore the interactive tool:

Quality of Adaptation Table


up