{"id":31069,"date":"2020-08-18T00:14:05","date_gmt":"2020-08-18T00:14:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.climatepolicyinitiative.org\/?post_type=cpi_publications&p=31069"},"modified":"2026-04-12T06:12:34","modified_gmt":"2026-04-12T06:12:34","slug":"green-banking-in-china-emerging-trends","status":"publish","type":"cpi_publications","link":"https:\/\/www.climatepolicyinitiative.org\/id\/publication\/green-banking-in-china-emerging-trends\/","title":{"rendered":"Green Banking in China \u2013 Emerging Trends \/ \u4e2d\u56fd\u7eff\u8272\u94f6\u884c\u4e1a\u2014\u2014\u65b0\u5174\u8d8b\u52bf"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

This discussion brief provides an overview of the development of green banking practices in China, identifying major policies and practices, performance to date, as well as barriers to further expansion. It also explores green banking practices within one of China\u2019s largest banks\u2014the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC)\u2014providing practical development and management examples of green banking practices. Through this work, policymakers can better understand green banking\u2019s successes to date, and what barriers need to be addressed to further scale green banking in China.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Green financial reform is especially important considering the scale of Chinese banks. China\u2019s four largest state-owned commercial banks, the \u201cBig Four,\u201d are also the largest banks in the world, with combined total assets of RMB 103.6 trillion (USD 14.8 trillion). Considering China is the largest source of CO2 emissions globally, accounting for nearly one third of the global total, and that up to RMB 95.45 trillion (USD 14 trillion) will be needed over the next decade to support China\u2019s green transition, accelerating green practices within China\u2019s banking ecosystem is essential to meeting decarbonization targets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The impact of China\u2019s banking system goes beyond China\u2019s borders. Together the Big Four contributed USD 240 billion to the fossil fuel industry from 2016 to 2019. 44% of this contribution, or USD 106 billion, went towards coal mining and coal power, making the Big Four the top four financiers of coal globally. China is also expected to finance in excess of USD 1 trillion for foreign infrastructure over the next ten years through its Belt and Road Initiative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This report also provides a first look at the performance of green credit portfolios of China\u2019s major banks. Our analysis indicates that green portfolios, to date, perform better than a benchmark of traditional portfolios in terms of non-performing loans. Although just one indicator, it suggests that expanding green banking in China could improve risk management. Taken together, the findings of this report show that a solid foundation for green banking is now established. Although the impact of green banking has been relatively small to date, there is significant potential to scale, which would have major impacts on the availability of financing for sustainable infrastructure around the world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DEVELOPMENT OF GREEN FINANCING IN CHINA<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Green finance has developed rapidly in China in recent years. Just like other elements of Chinese policymaking, the development has been top-down, with high-level directives guiding market development. Once there was high-level political buy-in, the market response was fast.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

After the launch of the Guidelines for Establishing the Green Financial System<\/a> in 2016, green credit policies proliferated across several ministries and regulators, including direct financial incentives provided to banks that expanded their green credit portfolios.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, the People\u2019s Bank of China (PBoC) created green incentives in two ways under its re-lending policy. Green loans are now accepted as part of the standing lending facility (SLF), and green bonds at AA rating are accepted as collateral in its medium-term lending facility (MLF), both of which deliver favorable capitalization and interest rate benefits. In addition, the evaluation of banks\u2019 green performance is now included in PBoC\u2019s macroprudential assessment (MPA) framework, giving banks additional incentive to expand and report on their green portfolios.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These changes also expanded the range of green instruments used by Chinese banks, showing increasing diversity across specialized tools, collateral methods, asset-backed securities, and international green credit lines, as shown in Figure 1 below. The most important instruments are green loans and green bonds, but the market is broader and includes mechanisms of international green finance cooperation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Figure ES1: Overview of the different types and examples of green credit tools<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

KEY STATISTICS<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The total balance of green loans is growing as a share of the overall credit balance, expanding from 8.8% in 2013 to 10.4% at the end of 2019, to reach a cumulative total of over RMB 10.6 trillion (USD 1.5 trillion). The vast majority went to clean transport and
clean energy, which made up 45% and 24% of green finance in 2019 respectively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Green loans in China have performed better than conventional loans. As shown in Figure 2 below, at the end of 2018, the non-performing Loan (NPL) ratio for green loans stood at 0.42%, while the overall credit NPL ratio stood at 1.83%.<\/strong> This is significant, as it indicates that green loans are less risky and such evidence can be used to justify including green factors for financial system governance by regulators. However, it should be noted that factors other than \u201cgreenness\u201d may be influencing the trend as well, such as the fact that many green loans are for infrastructure projects, which are already considered a relatively stable asset class.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Figure ES2: Non-performing loan proportions of green and non-green loans<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

IMPACTS ON THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The development of green bonds and green credit is starting to change the lending behavior and capitalization of Chinese banks. Due to regulatory pressure to increase financing for green activities, and the increasing understanding of the financial risks of high-carbon portfolios, banks are integrating green criteria into their lending decisions and credit risk analyses. Moreover, the decreasing size of customer deposits in China has driven banks to increasingly rely on capital markets, raising capital through bond issuance in international and Chinese interbank markets and by listing on stock markets.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The removal of the 75% loan-to-deposit ratio (LDR) requirement by the PBoC in 2015 paved the way for banks to issue more bonds, leading to a clear increase in LDRs across the banking sector. The average LDR of major banks reached 82% in 2018. This, however, adds pressure on banks as funding costs for deposits are approximately 1%, compared to bond issuance at 2.5% in the domestic interbank, and 3% in international capital markets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The top green lenders by proportion are state-owned commercial banks such as Bank of China, China Construction Bank, and Agricultural Bank of China. Two banks out of the 21 main banks in China are developing into banks specialized in green finance, namely Industrial Bank and Shanghai Pudong Development Bank. Both were amongst China\u2019s first green bond issuers
and have some of the highest green loan proportions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is also significant potential for China\u2019s three policy banks\u2014China Development Bank (CDB), China Export Import Bank (EXIM Bank), and the China Agricultural Development Bank (CADB)\u2014to take a greater role in green finance. Given their size, for example CDB\u2019s USD 2.4 trillion in assets compared to the World Bank\u2019s USD 600 billion, they are large enough to substantially impact green credit markets. However, currently these three banks rank among the lowest in green credit scores.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

TRENDS AND BARRIERS<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

All indications suggest the positive trends of green finance in China will continue. Fundamentally, the overarching policy direction of green finance is favorable and supported by both China\u2019s State Council and the Communist Party.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Despite recent pressures on the Chinese financial system, such as a lower GDP growth rate, a trade dispute with the US, and pressure to deleverage, green finance has continued to expand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, there are important barriers and limitations to further growth. These include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Governance<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n