{"id":40998,"date":"2021-09-27T18:24:20","date_gmt":"2021-09-27T18:24:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.climatepolicyinitiative.org\/?post_type=cpi_dataviz&p=40998"},"modified":"2026-04-08T15:15:19","modified_gmt":"2026-04-08T15:15:19","slug":"governance-area-of-influence-and-environmental-risks-of-transport-infrastructure-investments-case-studies-in-the-state-of-para","status":"publish","type":"cpi_dataviz","link":"https:\/\/www.climatepolicyinitiative.org\/id\/dataviz\/governance-area-of-influence-and-environmental-risks-of-transport-infrastructure-investments-case-studies-in-the-state-of-para\/","title":{"rendered":"Analysis and Mapping of Infrastructure Projects in the State of Par\u00e1: EF-170 Ferrogr\u00e3o, BR-155\/158, BR-163\/230\/MT\/PA, and BR-230"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Leia o relat\u00f3rio completo aqui<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n\n

Federal infrastructure projects use land that belongs to states and municipalities without necessarily consulting them formally about the work that will be carried out. However, like any major work, these projects cause both positive and negative impacts on territories and their respective populations.<\/p>\n\n

Promoting a dialogue with the Brazilian Federal Government is essential for state and municipal governments to develop actions to avoid or mitigate the negative effects of such projects or even compensate adversely affected populations. Before local governments can take a position; however, they must be aware of federal infrastructure planning in their lands, as well as potential issues that maybe be related to the infrastructure projects like governance, areas of influence, and possible impacts.<\/p>\n\n

Utilizando metodologias desenvolvidas por pesquisadores do Climate Policy Initiative\/Pontif\u00edcia Universidade Cat\u00f3lica do Rio de Janeiro\u00a0(CPI\/PUC-Rio), esse estudo realiza um mapeamento detalhado das principais obras federais no setor de infraestrutura terrestre para ocorrer no estado do Par\u00e1: EF-170 Ferrogr\u00e3o e BR-155\/158, ainda n\u00e3o iniciadas, e BR-163\/230\/MT\/PA e BR-230<\/strong>, em processo de execu\u00e7\u00e3o. Esse mapeamento permitir\u00e1 o governo estadual entender o ciclo desses projetos, seus potenciais impactos e possibilidades de debate com o governo federal. Al\u00e9m de um panorama geral, este documento aborda cada um dos quatro estudos de caso com maior profundidade. O trabalho utiliza duas metodologias b\u00e1sicas: a metodologia de mapeamento do ciclo de projetos para identifica\u00e7\u00e3o de oportunidades de di\u00e1logo com o governo federal e a abordagem de acesso a mercado para identifica\u00e7\u00e3o da \u00e1rea de influ\u00eancia e impactos previstos dos projetos.[1]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n

o illustrate the relevance of these federal projects for the state of Par\u00e1, CPI\/PUC-Rio (i) analyzed the project life cycles and socio-environmental studies to identify areas that could be strengthened, and (ii) quantified the deforestation potential of each project.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Project Life Cycle<\/h2>\n\n

The first step in understanding a project is knowing where it currently stands in its life cycle. In this sense, each project is represented in a flowchart that shows: (i) which stages the project will go through; (ii) which stages it has already completed; (iii) which documents are available in each stage; and (iv) the current stage of the project. The second step is knowing the most opportune moment for dialogue and with whom to interact. The third step is understanding what to approach at each given moment. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t